Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Handshake packet for ACK of the last client Handshake packet (#829)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 March 2018 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F001273B1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPkwOXl0zZWu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext1.iad.github.net [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C014D1270FC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:28:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1521037718; bh=imBT0wSWyYjw0cCg3OkwaCELS6eVNL5sf+cEVP+aRAE=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DFEFh/G2dQJL+keHgqanTymC73ZrakiLMzCiTpg/C9Ovp1NiT/cC78knX4dX/B2TI SBEIEC8WJawqLlgVacNqqeeNUFXYKZpi8Z0m1mzBBKbIVO40SgIJNlYAaM9yB5rLm4 dC+yCQQUrIWCPcod7Z9VyiCFscxbXTyBfmO5fUMQ=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2b70cf4a239dd62d4ec1015de63d486651a2810192cf0000000116c0f39692a169ce0fa74353@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829/373040717@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Handshake packet for ACK of the last client Handshake packet (#829)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aa93196e17d2_48bb3fbbcd182f2c1274b2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tutloJA6ztE0QutoepxXZcgk2c8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:28:41 -0000
That is not what the spec currently says: ``` 8.15.3. ACK Frames and Packet Protection ACK frames that acknowledge protected packets MUST be carried in a packet that has an equivalent or greater level of packet protection. ``` Personally, I believe ACK'ing the client finished in either handshake or 1-RTT encrypted packet should be allowed; though if I were to have to pick one, I'd prefer to go with the 1-RTT encrypted. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829#issuecomment-373040717
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cl… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a serve… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Hands… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Hands… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Hands… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a server use a Hands… Martin Thomson