Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length (#2869)

David Schinazi <> Wed, 03 July 2019 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BF6120663 for <>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-yG78mnpa4q for <>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17081120647 for <>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:18:34 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1562185114; bh=YYaJFGxTE68XywCoFMtH7XYrazbz1sDHitox/vTgUvo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DxAnA4/8kml7fH4N2m9dHdXB6YLWctMf464fqdOz4v0GfNN0+uf94AGKH9bbXGp8N BJZ91ZhD+KXfbORZIhe3YHuFnV/V8tqzHPwUvCynov/qIQDnoWapRYzb/PmSiLrh/t K0CmgVL4ccGX9+J8VQ9N/YnwAp49CXcxTKiW7RlU=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length (#2869)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d1d0d9aa0b21_2a3d3fb374ccd9602613da"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:18:44 -0000

@martinthomson What is this adversary trying to accomplish here? Can you elaborate on threat vector? The number 39 is reducing the reliability of the protocol, what security property does it give us in exchange?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: