IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B8A128CF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:50:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8dI9PNPQZPhN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:50:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6BB0128A6E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:50:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=sHtDnOuuL51mGvc1x/Pz53VOcKo=; b=sBFD1izoSD210VeT IjrhN7RUQI2Jg84jkzTSwK+XKdcR+dzmbWMzzCTT0cCsosCkBBlc2qwMrINdxOPG h4AsWbefAJnzq5YGQyW51yRjAj3zWnPO9Dt0cU+KzfLOxtH8/OZHEUftn7dC+ZmJ URRSG224QPEMDsXPcIWwB54W15o=
Received: by filter1321p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1321p1mdw1-2977-5BEAF2C0-E 2018-11-13 15:50:24.823872337 +0000 UTC m=+510644.831799430
Received: from github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.34]) by ismtpd0037p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id -x1YUGmqRlCFw_4R-Sbv-g for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:50:24.654 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE10580958 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:50:24 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab01e38f7c0f362d1c3b79a2a71ab616e36ea6c81a92cf000000011802b4c092a169ce168cd044@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980/438315896@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beaf2c0abc41_3c793ff6b96d45bc314936"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3/aDhI6DS/nW8+FkbTS+sJML56leLm7YI83D cwt4givx4a9V+AUvs/TrVCQ262qT0Oxzs0BdXfkXPtrkAtGPjPa93NotKBWN7gWowwn3XCwauBIc4E FcFfUXPoixwJ0YQ7xO/Cu8wxK9Onaquev71uggxs75omtZSbNlmqkKHXqw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/u5reuLZdoNjkyCDuNh4xmmdBJzQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:50:27 -0000

Note that LB to backend encryption is of interest to this protocol: Some cloud providers offer a fast internal network but the network is not invisible to other customers and at the very least injection attacks are a concern. For this reason a basic QUIC handshake does make sense. If cloud providers can agree on a standard protocol it would be simpler to deploy cloud services in a generic fashion.

I kind of hope something similar could be made for updating name servers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980#issuecomment-438315896

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email