IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] Move version-independent pieces to a "core" document (#615)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A536D129BA2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k06iZeiZ-MFG for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2545412706D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Lt7XVEzUNpvMEQqrBcbKj7REgxI=; b=hVLRmsn2oHiKPR4R KpYyv0fnqCGq7/QxMUbSNLKxGZwn7T6O55U2a76vIayWo5SIsA/2zRt6tgG2ZtQ4 hY65ZfGl7YPPBEQvzk4Ip24tuyliJxo96btu+SK4YPi+ykykWiSKD6VLvGtC9+qq bvS9DWQsMbH2TUD443g5VdlqfcA=
Received: by filter1142p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1142p1mdw1-21653-5939480A-21 2017-06-08 12:50:18.270966163 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id kkilXebkQ56sw9-cm7m6mA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:50:18.203 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:50:18 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7b7dccfcab2820d43c591329e649bcfc4f256ccc92cf0000000115510a0a92a169ce0dfa6fe2@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/615@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move version-independent pieces to a "core" document (#615)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5939480a10ac8_305d3ff2b834dc2c3907e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak30MpyIsshsDCFuo4OsZ5C7H3IJR5x0505WhG jbob4P+UdMpAgJ0YGxpKQIs9+frMIEYwDO8StHNlcCt2qZAmRN+Jit2tHgpj/mBnc1WZBKXzpnFOsY WNbo32ND3BIaA5PnyMKY/3NB/bjRiy7nRAoUwOB83s5GSh0/UNpNKS+NqiELOG9fItD7pr92lSEtVX 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uEAarg9AbV6fKMip4iGWugwNu-A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:50:22 -0000

Several existing sub-issues around what is version-independent.  I'm proposing that the cross-version envelope of QUIC should be a separate final RFC, and therefore a separate document now.  If we landed that split, it would resolve several other questions about what, specifically, is supposed to be cross-version.

I would argue that version negotiation and everything that's visible outside the encryption envelope belongs in this separate draft.  It's the piece that will ossify, and that we're willing to have ossified.  Everything that's version-dependent belongs in the specific version, which is the Transport draft.

However, I'll note that the current split means that packet protection and framing live inside the version.  That means there's a lot that will need to be re-stated in a new version -- are we okay with that?

See PR #600.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/615

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status