Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is ACK delay zero for Initial and Handshake ACK frames? (#3459)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744561200E9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:36:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s3OraEYEd1aZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0BD1200B5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78418C115C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:36:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582101410; bh=q2/2jAoP8vbd/e0posagZu4Z0pz+pRxLBApgFslLmYY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OFHyPMpgMerbujGM7IXVMxhmw0nHp96uvKa0Bv2UptJL3f4/PB4OCZlg0hy7RbwAG J9O5MVt9PXzIRZih3IQ4vGBBEu8E0C1autTOLQvmDqChDWy2Cq1qZFsFVcMnulFIhp W4oFwLzc6hGgfk5+vXtITEtvNN/jm7vL+D1BuqAo=
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:36:50 -0800
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZYYWVOFCMCFT5E3BV4LITCFEVBNHHCDL4S2A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3459/588099777@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3459@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3459@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is ACK delay zero for Initial and Handshake ACK frames? (#3459)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4cf3a2a872f_79b23fde2cacd95c256952"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uK7Tg7Td5GcG14IKSIP9myhZScY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:36:54 -0000

Ah, so we are not limiting `max_ack_delay`, we are overwriting `ack_delay`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3459#issuecomment-588099777