Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Murray Kucherawy's QPACK Comment 1 (#4797)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFFB3A1A2D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:19:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDzXyU0-u_60 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69FB13A1A2C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-406371c.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.22.15]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B92CA840E70 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:19:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611620362; bh=oCFQY5qAOCIjKYQS0FGwWpaUwO6FWvjFBDaan0ft0fI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pQ9K0QmApCWpAHfph32lfAMlY8Pw++dI0iwXz/0oOHm+1H/7Bv3YqWGz4ILUSsWgn jx6bA/zfgq2Nzlo2IzgxQSaTUX8opPI0sIk2yo5T6IQI7WDv2Lu1uxaUe4h0XhI5Us +gX2UWBsGqGO+CkJ6c8F/bTpOSP5ooFSbfcvEtTc=
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:19:22 -0800
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4A2R3M7XRSYSCWN556DNAQVEVBNHHC6J7SKI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4797/767196768@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4797@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4797@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Murray Kucherawy's QPACK Comment 1 (#4797)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_600f600ab6ada_481a04217985"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uQq_vWaMLOi4UnA0BI0VDvDNvBI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:19:24 -0000

I think we can change to SHOULD NOT.  I'd rather not be so prescriptive here, since a QPACK implementation might well cut this corner and ignore flow control constraints and rely on higher levels of the stack to ensure the necessary flow control is available?  I guess I could be convinced otherwise.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4797#issuecomment-767196768