Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 21:30:12 -0700
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab8c704fcd6da0433c4fe65cc9c25008888c0e0ca692cf0000000118baa75492a169ce197bb0c1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574/review/221445300@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language for stateless reset
 (#2574)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca2e55439f06_4fbf3ff870cd45bc57744b";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ude-VYNmn98oasU5AsmOcWdHshk>


----==_mimepart_5ca2e55439f06_4fbf3ff870cd45bc57744b
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

martinduke commented on this pull request.

Looks good, but I'd like two more normative statements about sending Stateless Reset in the first place. If I receive a packet for which I have no context, MUST I send a Stateless Reset or SHOULD I, assuming I might have sent the token?

Furthermore, SHOULD I do some sort of rate control to avoid sending 1 SR per packet?



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-221445300
----==_mimepart_5ca2e55439f06_4fbf3ff870cd45bc57744b
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p><b>@martinduke</b> commented on this pull request.</p>

<p>Looks good, but I'd like two more normative statements about sending Stateless Reset in the first place. If I receive a packet for which I have no context, MUST I send a Stateless Reset or SHOULD I, assuming I might have sent the token?</p>
<p>Furthermore, SHOULD I do some sort of rate control to avoid sending 1 SR per packet?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-221445300">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkqwUrfNgf0PGyRLi8eIz2wY6EquKuks5vctzUgaJpZM4cU9vF">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkqxok0st530tx1FYtt15qr9YBki03ks5vctzUgaJpZM4cU9vF.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@martinduke commented on #2574"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-221445300"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-221445300",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-221445300",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5ca2e55439f06_4fbf3ff870cd45bc57744b--