Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via header block acknowledgment (#1399)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A0C12DB72 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XMfnhjGSZ-d2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93ECF12DB6C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 16:18:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1527895125; bh=sLz64KDbLqXJ8AHew44uCUumCaaBLh8DodlNwtVbT/A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VFO1oDPdbdzyCCSOxsU4qEw3oNuY8Ix9BTOO0f/SBDBvBt2YoHr18Hsy1QB8WjmMM wGU97HHcHZ9f/DT68cooZj47b2G468JL9RYNfAV/wOgqaANjO/+fv9c5QlpcOeL6TZ v9rFDUQ9FJaNkden+xfnVoyMJwDqPQqCL/68Vktc=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab42a7fd7a5e9e29fda67cc5eb73d728d64cf7399892cf000000011729965592a169ce13860808@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399/c394033454@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via header block acknowledgment (#1399)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b11d455ed6fd_549b2ae85d05ef543776a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uor4_ZFPDys9tUbMH-CMz2oL1ZY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:18:49 -0000

I think this discussion no longer belongs inside the TSS instruction.  If the tracking of decoder state involves the encoder combining information from HA and TSS, and the decoder has to track the encoder's inferences from HA to generate TSS, this is a complex enough system to deserve its own subsection.

Then TSS simply says that it advances the greatest acknowledged index by however many entries, and references that subsection.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399#issuecomment-394033454