Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of duplicate packets (#1405)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223B4130EC6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXKhrvpsvknH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2018D130ED7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:39:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1529329171; bh=cQnnDyg78hZuaKAm3vGwMSyTDJ3mHLBl8ABx4Kw8/p4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ieg/qogrJ5gHU1Ru62zXaNHsu6CF/5QHwLYoQtlAQcXuv+Rg2Yl/J9yspAuTSa/zV xe6oTVcHoKHAB7fDeck1QA1mFjdaNFj8PMKnMvxYSRx7S3Vju3KN3M74LXWyOtCJoL V1pUjAqDv5HyJ8UjqmwTDAFNpCT9N5736bcJ6l2g=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abad1b46f62813fb7ae936086910eeb7cb288393a292cf00000001173f781392a169ce138d6870@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1405/398057102@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1405@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1405@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of duplicate packets (#1405)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b27b61379a00_1c30c3fc489910f7c89449"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ussMsf5UHy5lHo_t3cbNJBOmJxM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:39:42 -0000

@gloinul 
> But, to fulfill that for ECN, at least if there are no strict requirement on duplication suppression do requires the ECN specification to change.

That's correct. Duplication suppression will be required if we adopt the encoding proposed in #1372.

I am merely pointing out that #1372 is the only thing that requires suppression, and that we have a chance of dropping the requirement if we adopt an alternative encoding as we have been discussing in #1439.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1405#issuecomment-398057102