Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 24 April 2019 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B4C12046D for <>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKPUrDZrK6Sh for <>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB72B120464 for <>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:41:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1556149278; bh=E4wfXRzSKS6TAc/t25seeCvNwW6zZKNxPi9b43C58yA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zkPRwkwHIVrcJgunhH8zoFaZ71he+lf+tPN8jVw5kyt8DTCjOf94HUIGZ2xx2V2kl 1xcTsOeIKc7iVLPZIzdTFk1xP/0O6Bht78HrUUL1mD0//I55jIX8+5PTRLDrt13F4Y KnqM3GH0JkWFh//HnzWCOVP/Io2Lg5hqSOEkoNDk=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2632/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cc0f41ebdb9f_55f53ffac60cd96470279b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:41:22 -0000

That's also a detail of one particular push implementation, not an inherent way that push works.  I *think* the Push implementation in WinInet would still work, because the push cache is at the level of a request group rather than an individual connection.  (Somewhat moot for deployment use, but existence proof that there's more than one possible implementation of that.)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: