Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C56131092 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xoE4TAsMSZqf for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DB71310D3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 09:22:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528215720; bh=4rN89kz0T+uS6cmtH+qKxtU13YVKRkpv6j4Fzs/BHOk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Bw7aMfyI44FPk3BJeh57pz7kF4DX8grBkRg/GR7WVzIBZ08Khf+dyPFi3lb9iUxFg 2OeILnm5ioRNmsv7scZbkB05KMkS21q37SlUtK2J4wmCoNsY8dwUgvS/5c3+Vkt02m 1QCPbXwcW1ORc6XY85BTDOkbnUXxUYpntJy04Hp4=
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc1e200fab7f5bd2927416a06ac3089ca3102e2b392cf00000001172e7aa892a169ce12c973b1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296/394772384@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b16b8a89d0a5_70ab2b25f2dd8f5480733"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pravb
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uxIEnzAZb8v3dtu9P7wsvcaKdhY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:22:03 -0000
@martinthomson I see that the issue is on the agenda to be discussed. PNE aims to solve two problems - ossification and unlinkability for voluntary migration. The primary motivation for making it optional is that there are deployments where one or both of these problems do not exist. Using versions does not help if the version number is not standardized and it also effectively halves the version space. I would prefer that we use a transport parameter for this. Always encrypting PNE for long headers is not a concern since the TLS handshake is already many orders of magnitude costlier. The primary concern around PNE is performance and hardware offloads, so making it optional for short headers solves this issue and can be negotiated in transport parameters. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296#issuecomment-394772384
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … borisPis
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform shou… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … bobdug
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … ianswett