Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss considerations for max_ack_delay (#2186)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A41412046D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uXhF9cbRJBU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D601E120444 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=RVpDQLYVhtm7uAGhrqCdKy6c9jE=; b=ZCSDqtTH3gYtLOsy qkFDJRaGjm23lNKb9RfGfDP3hGzhnkMyyL1h/nQQy0YxRTjjscIqcCQXo788gONf Y8j+3n+Cp3EEgogIYi6F5avpNFXzPpLJTA7/Y0sC0qr0M3ozFC2ij051aAyjOV8q whSbFY2mRNlXEuj4Tb1mCIEDfi8=
Received: by filter0514p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0514p1iad2-15169-5CB4E6DF-15 2019-04-15 20:17:35.539047787 +0000 UTC m=+592445.559765290
Received: from github-lowworker-baaab27.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.33]) by ismtpd0050p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id BxkvV7m4TQqapWv4FN1OTA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:17:35.470 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-baaab27.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F144803E5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:17:35 +0000
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcfb6ac0c5c69157373d0f0c45ec25e9d457b871492cebac2195f92a169ce175240ec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186/483402315@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss considerations for max_ack_delay (#2186)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb4e6df6d591_51923ffb9a0d45b4272545"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3TCkyjQXPlk5YjZEG9c+T6PZPGCplR17XE2B hEzpQazjxx2o33DSv3dyH3u0SEdKoB0V7kcnQmjaIahjyMJ+ZH2P7fPPn6pr3bo3XYfHyKxU9+fogC 9nGhozvBHEn4phm/c/gjypDYmt2Ipg/UvLMrYHTzFfrgiUaOykQgAeuHRoVf4s7vXt3T6qibFC1Dfb A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/v1bm9fp9C7A65KN9IlT-TSp21Qo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:17:46 -0000

@pravb: I've proposed separating platform delays from stack-controllable delays in #2596. My thinking has moved since this issue was first filed, and I now think that max-ack-delay should only include stack-controllable delays. Any additional delays will go into the smoothed_rtt anyways, so any timers should account for those delays via the increase in the smoothed_rtt. At any rate, I propose that we move discussion of that specific question to #2596.

I'm closing this issue, let's open new issues for any other more specific concerns.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186#issuecomment-483402315