Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 09 June 2017 15:04 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BA6127076 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-EDnn-h-YXK for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9FCC126D74 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=AU6jU8BZw4utAzLmLelGHxDRKFI=; b=pltBMlSkn1Vc3qDS YS+6Y+SLuvRGiFVzNfjirMtfM3+eczQ23Ew+R2otT+X5x2cGX/gW4js34NOd67l9 ujifLifcxku6t9K7s9ZOj3rnQcO5wuMD6V+0JHXSz22JJgbd02sDsxSrbWeMgHNI kH3y0svSiUDNyQa21d1SrpXCdNo=
Received: by filter0972p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0972p1mdw1-30836-593AB906-1D 2017-06-09 15:04:38.433816742 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 2rMONt_MSmmf46hyOHd5pg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 15:04:38.376 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 08:04:38 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7a28d1a4f44f59dd48775696bd5be592aaed75b392cf0000000115527b0692a169ce0df938a1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/609/c307413865@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/609@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/609@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_593ab9063d347_13803f8af377bc2c10145"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3SN9QHENEG3norjF6IXGqkJxaM2Vv+VhGmKS /cAPz0Out4nEj8pndzSWj+jAtBq4EXkyFIjfTS96eZAdHLtvfSP6HWRaW8Wu6VongMLuxqBtldLYjd fnBXCpef7Y4lTJPB90VkVPpfsm8IPqZ0Us4H2kYbprLQ7GXq1GPUQc3n5okCCGXsMcTTxm4evlbY3x c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vI-WySXwC2Qs5XtG2RvX48HlmMw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 15:04:41 -0000
Thinking about this some more, this bit will flip lots in ways that aren't immediately obvious. I think that we can safely not grease this. (We could also grease it, but that makes it a teensy bit less accessible to the devices who we intend to consume it, so not greasing is probably best.) Either way, that's not a question we need to resolve with the change as it stands. I still strongly think that we should avoid adding this to the list of transport features, and I think that you should address @ianswett's comments about dropping an entire flight (the answer being just "oh well" here). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/609#issuecomment-307413865
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) hardie
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609) Martin Thomson