IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake (#3158)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECEA12004A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W38c4H9WnwZJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4756120018 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:55:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572256548; bh=BsCMNrF28UNT5XeDuCDpHtGLG2etlOaAAUAdeFQ2WEs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=O4PHNYbsJUbfeH6FOahL8OrDnY5JNMpv6Id1evSZH1VOaTCuFo37uvPjCR1Z0qsJo z2iJFCKcv0KV5Dd3onn7j+ly6mWHZQGB1QerdweYfEUhNd5pDfnK3soD7QFUukxLRY jHn3+EqyVwMJzxZ1pljOh08OwwAIXPBFqJtgNCMA=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6BQDBEEMLXAUN45U53YPW2JEVBNHHB5FU4AM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158/546873058@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake (#3158)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db6bb24e7f0e_5a1d3fec532cd95c325137"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vMBGRCR9aJp6CWLk0zzfAgGKUyE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:55:51 -0000

As stated above, I think option 1 is problematic in sense that the endpoint might not know which application protocol it is taking, though the error code being used is specific to the application protocol.

Even for Handshake packets it is hard to tell if the peer has learnt the application protocol in use, as CRYPTO frames and CONNECTION_CLOSE might get delivered out of order.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158#issuecomment-546873058

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email