IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 16 January 2019 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B285130F79 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 103C1HAeQ-lt for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E86CB130F99 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:32:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=ZmLh/K3xEiJ/3GpyppqG+gZ2KOQ=; b=Snoh3W26KQwdJ30x aXqpgu9yNDVHUONj1KKGr2qiW5TrBQSL7M3J5eT1H43XD2fHJhv3SflPyVQoNgK8 48KL6Yt6/QeKTid6a9u4Sao7ICqyq8LxlkJccENUAhDRBka1SHrLK42qtRTpPHGR W/2sqw+hBCXNpv3tMiwlfv+zo0s=
Received: by filter0147p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0147p1iad2-29813-5C3E7BAB-4F 2019-01-16 00:32:43.786406632 +0000 UTC m=+93090.507475691
Received: from github-lowworker-fc273f0.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.33]) by ismtpd0012p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id DEDlL4smT4mzfHJF_EP3Aw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:32:43.624 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-fc273f0.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972AAC0C0F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:32:43 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab025459a9c4dce0a32d684e55bc2255b721d1be2392cf0000000118563dab92a169ce14c4e0aa@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637/review/192929446@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3e7bab95d4f_3a043fd9f52d45c4300779"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak25Ilt1xfrnFQsXyOtbD3kDBfXnycLQeOznPw gD9eMABG60w8UTaH+UvMk2ihb5IPm88ARDUSAG2Yr5ZRWpODMB67EUXuIeeG6LOaPcWhFSkW4aaukV rQ9ZaASQHHXujv29JAP4ytK5HEsZrfr8/nyTeyDclHTfnglL+kGh2F5sJ/2scX59QFrCMVutnAQvBQ Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vVshIJ3BEdlB1OdAcymvT94gBbg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:32:59 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> @@ -999,6 +996,18 @@ paces the sending of any packets in excess of the initial congestion window.
 A sender MAY implement alternate mechanisms to update its congestion window
 after idle periods, such as those proposed for TCP in {{?RFC7661}}.
 
+## Application Limited Sending
+
+The congestion window should not be increased in slow start or congestion
+avoidance when it is not fully utilized.  The congestion window could be
+under-utilized due to insufficient application data to send or flow control
+limits.
+
+When the sender is pacing(see {{pacing}}) packets, the sender may be unable
+to use the full congestion window for a period of time after receiving an
+ACK, due to pacing.  In this case, the sender should not consider themselves

You need more than an ACK, you need one that contains fresh acknowledgments, right?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637#discussion_r248114813

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email