IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AAF1200C3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dX0QPdpV_EoU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C157120047 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=cxHHGSH8lz8pnuzhX0OLecvChRA=; b=mnTM+WuE9HLnmL0T Dskt4cd8PUzjaIAmrlNZiggavIg0zLOoB7Hvoenu1yQSPsvgGgRkPnnbh4qE1fum 7anmo/tpV00qgrr6e+jjWSkX8270/ilx+Uj6NqbJlszYYmsxTm5HZ+6Z9Owpe5fS imyNV2rS/DiWh47ywP8C+PaWcTA=
Received: by filter1212p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1212p1las1-5686-5CAE52FF-19 2019-04-10 20:33:03.264803614 +0000 UTC m=+158546.961723962
Received: from github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.43]) by ismtpd0008p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id cScWXNpKReabgt6r7_AoDw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:33:03.207 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220B14207EF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:33:03 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab62d15c1461569b719f21878b7f63c5db56d2729992cebabb857f92a169ce195b61e0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555/481850840@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle period for congestion control (#2555)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cae52ff1ff92_6ec33fc27bad45bc55065e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3HBIRKtxmS/iiIx9ZFKCgzjrXwDDS2A3jOt0 ejQJc76P03zE0II+DeYnVRaD4rkU5EdHao+4FgGJd+TKtsGUFyDwcwfJDlu5N0ajyco9YJEy0WynzK +aSO0RwKQAWlVbNl/eGhXjx2rjJlcMYDVD0ZXJDYMm758hxZ+Zlko2uWhw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vZaqzgelZxdaqwpnaku3pZfGLYQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:33:38 -0000

My goal is to document the best practices and reference existing RFCs whenever possible.  And yes, my understanding is that everyone disables slow start after idle, so I'd like to come up with something I think is more likely to be deployed.

When QUIC was started, Cubic wasn't an RFC, which is the other reason we documented Reno instead of Cubic, FYI.

I'll write up a PR based on your suggestion and hopefully we can get some text we all think is acceptable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2555#issuecomment-481850840

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email