Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 22 November 2018 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056C4130EA3 for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:41:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BEnhZVmMKkbC for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C20C130EB0 for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:41:49 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1542847309; bh=XaO39zX++BhCdueJOOv8gY0zeyJAudZE/mf1ESn135Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=p0C9n85TPN5Zs0FIK2MW2qA2JYg3mwq1/NenwhZsqvRVNKcOJwknWZEXBAEWyENqH ifLITzPuLi8K/GbQ9eFDkXkxW10r5zlkhpJSAri/kMwaUFdWOczU50WHcxRbiqcBeW 3+dbpxj57hyzUL+DEl+of8yJvguPpbpDriAb47uA=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf5fb4de8dae_1e693f8ee30d45c4571a5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:42:05 -0000

I like that formulation.  It recognizes the problem and recommends a simple solution (ignore for Handshake), but doesn't prohibit implementations from improving on that, or from choosing a simpler implementation that is slightly worse.  It's a corner case that doesn't need tons of spec machinery to support.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: