Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RETIRE_KEYS proposal (#2492)

martinduke <> Wed, 20 March 2019 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80160127873 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.384
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXpcrydWKRfP for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C5712008F for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:48:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1553111294; bh=UwEAuO8fQ0+31y7Z5weJfx0p1LDZQuZvL2rZM724Wm8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DRT4TDGhGxTq6RwTu2umUHzuQ+1g+OuPM76saPzd3WyFeDVPaigy7oxn5Ylhd0UG2 csRSfPoaRXbp+OlbG60bGXH8XXQL5tMbDpqwJnyNGABhfo+cHQxeBnt5PLjYU7Lo+y AgBcRAb+sJrewQZbM8wflgN9EbvC+XRWDQSzBwgk=
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2492/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RETIRE_KEYS proposal (#2492)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9298febc076_74873f9732cd45c01104e0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:48:18 -0000

I find this proposal tp be most straightforward of the three. It is clear and unambiguous signal with a minimum-size frame that allows us to drop keys without fussing with timers or messy logic around what the peer has "proven".

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: