Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve HTTP draft wording: frames carry identifier values (#3689)

Lucas Pardue <> Wed, 27 May 2020 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0193B3A0E9F for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFw333uCT4Zq for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE2D3A0E9D for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41A56A0AA0 for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1590594331; bh=aQd18Yv7r2Knh4XhM3OtcAj9OwCu0mosQxTfsY8zh0Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=C0IIXUnFg6Tu2AqMgePtptuk3B75rDTotvDKxkFSldOha/dw72dqjF3DMl2Ka7b2o RGX4qa1i6bSupXX8gCOBJrNSikJBEUIyTuhCJuHX8/xF+UZzeVyyp/RqkePNu/Gyzo l5GsvMZzZQl8U8DCpDXE4SO9ctlzmH44gyfov+rI=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:45:31 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3689/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve HTTP draft wording: frames carry identifier values (#3689)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ece8b1be4b9c_65893fbce26cd96c1956e9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:45:34 -0000

@LPardue commented on this pull request.

> +frames indicating different identifiers, but the identifier in each frame
+MUST NOT be greater than the identifier in any previous frame, since clients
+might already have retried unprocessed requests on another connection.

I like the improvement but will highlight that this is an alternative way to present the described behaviour later on 

Like the server, the client MAY send subsequent GOAWAY
frames so long as the specified Push ID is strictly smaller than all previously
sent values.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: