Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 01:19:55 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4abb93daf3759bb58fa7ad7a8799c6c2540fe42ef0092cf0000000115609cab92a169ce0df59194@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/605/309680149@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/605@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/605@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Wrongly hinting of issues not existing for
 packet number size increase (#605)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5948daabaf44_10153fdd85a45c34898e7";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/w6KUy8BvCBp7K9b6HHDpInM65Xc>


----==_mimepart_5948daabaf44_10153fdd85a45c34898e7
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I say semi-blocked (as opposed to say, deadlocked) because you can just move to the bigger packet number space and essentially declare the older uacked ones presumed-lost. 

This will not work if it is decided to require gapless packet numbers except on path migration - something I'd argue for.

#595 suggests variable length integers which I think is a good idea.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/605#issuecomment-309680149
----==_mimepart_5948daabaf44_10153fdd85a45c34898e7
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<blockquote>
<p>I say semi-blocked (as opposed to say, deadlocked) because you can jus=
t move to the bigger packet number space and essentially declare the olde=
r uacked ones presumed-lost.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This will not work if it is decided to require gapless packet numbers =
except on path migration - something I'd argue for.</p>
<p><a href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/595" class=3D"=
issue-link js-issue-link" data-url=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-draf=
ts/issues/595" data-id=3D"233893653" data-error-text=3D"Failed to load is=
sue title" data-permission-text=3D"Issue title is private">#595</a> sugge=
sts variable length integers which I think is a good idea.</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&m=
dash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre=
ad.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quic=
wg/base-drafts/issues/605#issuecomment-309680149">view it on GitHub</a>, =
or <a href=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq4Xy8=
MRjuc7pTCFY-kh1h4Ymx76eks5sF4CrgaJpZM4Nypwu">mute the thread</a>.<img alt=
=3D"" height=3D"1" src=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq4G=
ZlFdSU4qBABZEB4aK4SWUuamkks5sF4CrgaJpZM4Nypwu.gif" width=3D"1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop=3D"action" itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/ViewActi=
on">
  <link itemprop=3D"url" href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/is=
sues/605#issuecomment-309680149"></link>
  <meta itemprop=3D"name" content=3D"View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop=3D"description" content=3D"View this Issue on GitHub"></me=
ta>
</div>

<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_versio=
n":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name"=
:"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"=
quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"http=
s://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6=
-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubuserconte=
nt.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","=
action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr=
afts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@mikkelfj in #=
605: \u003e I say semi-blocked (as opposed to say, deadlocked) because yo=
u can just move to the bigger packet number space and essentially declare=
 the older uacked ones presumed-lost. \r\n\r\nThis will not work if it is=
 decided to require gapless packet numbers except on path migration - som=
ething I'd argue for.\r\n\r\n#595 suggests variable length integers which=
 I think is a good idea."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://=
github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/605#issuecomment-309680149"}}}</scri=
pt>=

----==_mimepart_5948daabaf44_10153fdd85a45c34898e7--