Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection Migration Failure when Path MTU is asymmetric (#4216)

Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7183A0DF4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DYl7QrVpWk24 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77E73A0B6F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-27fea81.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.110.37]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C7BDC90007B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1603185402; bh=Fz6+fbZMLiezjSSlLIhcUjpvDRxR35h98sIMyDT3+Z8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=w0hmsvHQjGk/ZossjfxGofnqzCLbG+KJ3tYmjtoReyBIMRM+Fh+icWF0sd5jQUwNo Ti1xs4Yk+WHIX58Weq+ZEMhCvyKUKJg8UYAUcCoXLRaghN0vMgaBzugqEHdGfSh3mR 6RE8/PQO9ahMGmit/i6FAC/1lF0/llTbTRxyEr7Q=
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:16:42 -0700
From: Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2F2Z3EW2PFL67L6SN5TKF7VEVBNHHCWCLPEA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4216/712713355@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4216@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4216@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection Migration Failure when Path MTU is asymmetric (#4216)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f8eaafac3c84_5419b41038b2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/wDpw_yb5UCjjhoPnCJA6GT0uFqE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:16:45 -0000

Simply note that I think the proposal in #4241 appear to be an okay resolution. I would recommend that people consider also #4188 so they are aligned. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4216#issuecomment-712713355