IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3691E127342 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:10:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ez0pWvY7maQt for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:10:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D497612420B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:10:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Ed3yJVvFekQzJkgsUVbjvfHea7U=; b=VuYdoSyXiYkPPfsL Nm1sjs7ay6fAii0hsonwln5NHBxcArZ/cCC8yiypP6qFac+NEO0wJ+P4/FZW5J+8 0daRGu+4OqL7v+rcJnOo1Unph3c1Uv5j46+B2WV0dwzfoC31jMc2A8BkDF8BMA0l ZneZkVmVH9lvDo402qV7nbzq/ok=
Received: by filter0483p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0483p1las1-16447-5A1F0635-8 2017-11-29 19:10:45.422612154 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0009p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id UbA6N0oPSqSJLE5cDmjjOw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:10:45.335 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:10:45 +0000
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0b3ed920d30bcb82f339faf0116a16aa48d4456792cf000000011636c83492a169ce1075d33e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956/c347964273@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a1f0634579c8_12633fbcc6348f38287142"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1no1qNkZPY1CAGNUe35GtfVWHV7Jysj8RRwm xFQib+Fo9KlW51J15eZj39PndC88woR2Dwlx68HOWR0bh4ownhlPO89luGYEfWeDaTWe6lzkVOVRfm hb9jx6gkOxqqR1sYKtDDp4bmbexc5G7dmQMPw7wQz/sIt4dTzDPoMzWA2fzOTa0EQGG4hbbZVkmixp U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/wJBe6rghYl7qsvC-hckWjhifhoY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:10:48 -0000

I'm surprised to see this PR merged -- I don't think we had agreed on STUN types being necessary to multiplex with. In addition to concerns about GQUIC vs QUIC, there remains the high-level question of what do we need to multiplex QUIC with on the same port. This was a conversation that made good progress in Singapore, and I was expecting to continue it and finalize on list.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956#issuecomment-347964273

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status