Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PTO MUST send new data or retransmit data if possible (#3057)

ianswett <> Mon, 28 October 2019 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB75120123 for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8BhBpgdLmXh for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A94DD12007A for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:08:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572286108; bh=ucvhHLKObL6Zw0mM+xc+lXICtmaFH6y9ftf/L73O1OU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=v2rC6M/Bu9IZh5aUDxYf4nIgOv95v9fCBhOIX9Bq/MagBEO4kaOARTgErixewQh3F XHlVo9yOfLlmAHJQWGfyIL0FGry3mSbj35fVNC+y+/y5pMa35yikzgjM4Umz7NUHLN abBGq33ndLIjERLp2A4TCNEqeyUalTui/vUPiFQM=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3057/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PTO MUST send new data or retransmit data if possible (#3057)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db72e9cb63de_697f3faaee4cd960773b5"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:08:32 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -495,11 +495,9 @@ a PATH_RESPONSE to seed initial_rtt for a new path, but the delay SHOULD NOT
 be considered an RTT sample.
 Until the server has validated the client's address on the path, the amount of
-data it can send is limited, as specified in Section 8.1 of {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}}.
-Data at Initial encryption MUST be retransmitted before Handshake data and
-data at Handshake encryption MUST be retransmitted before any ApplicationData
-data.  If no data can be sent, then the PTO alarm MUST NOT be armed until
-data has been received from the client.
+data it can send is limited to three times the amount of data received,
+as specified in Section 8.1 of {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}}. If no data can be sent,

I created to discuss whether we want to make a design change here, FWIW.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: