Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)

Mike Bishop <> Mon, 28 October 2019 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC883120112 for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Sdn2SP9A0Yy for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAEAC12004E for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:10:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572293402; bh=a35CkDxy7G2QK2eXgbhNrkhjZGGsnMsyzm583XCn3l4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1th9Aqlgy0T4Ttk+5MuBg2pn5Yt6Nif/L6YdpeU4noynTy3re0Il4TkB0FpSQ3F+b V8szVklfF0WaYUw08ZCxdxA0gU+G9/LtE5hgv98NrAuQTLdk5tJ5UM0bsmGMM6NsDx Sk1fmO88yTNTiG6YodNE+2iGBESwp8rMGvQiQayA=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db74b1ac48ac_202e3f864cacd96c296889"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:10:05 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.

This removes the text that you have to track references.  Of course you *do* to accomplish what this section describes.  Do we want a normative term somewhere?

Separately, discussion started on Slack -- maybe instead of improving the language about the term overlap, we could just change the term used for one of the "blocking"s.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: