IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)

Alexis La Goutte <notifications@github.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9152F1200DE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcuOyY1UNHk9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA48E120033 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.92]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086FA1C0A0A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:04:37 -0700
From: Alexis La Goutte <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7HZ4KVBOEKVQ7UXUF3R5A4LEVBNHHB2WTA7U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020/532616269@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d820135edb5e_5f143ff3248cd9601174c9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: alagoutte
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/wj7MNZUAkL7Xpq8UJFM9zDPPkDE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:04:41 -0000

> 
> 
> I agree with @ianswett, and I don't think we need to go varint here, that seems like a bit of an overkill. How about reserving 4096 codepoints for spec required, and leaving the rest (2^16 - 2^12 = 61440) for experimentation:
> [0x0000 - 0x0fff] uses the RFC8128 Specification Required policy
> [0x1000 - 0xffff] is reserved for experimentation

Split in two ? what the same size ?

Don't forget there is also GREASE TP now

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020#issuecomment-532616269

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email