Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport error codes would be smaller and more consistent as a varint (#2672)

ianswett <> Thu, 09 May 2019 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245831200C1 for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.606
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUHnbMCYkO1e for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61401200B6 for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 06:41:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557409316; bh=dxQDoEgz6ycImys688nJ2d8rA1z6dNqlIBbLXu6EHS0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CvWeFszz4xOM5C36y+4U2UEvNvEGpLRJ6/tlPgTMl0eMMLXuEj747IEwgjIIn1GSS Woaht/4frb3GvGtWZw9zdo2HF2BLAr0zyZg2cZYbdsxteMJvktfSHtRtYOgbuY6YL2 kAGx9vn9kyADv6/ez8jniLwJgIDrpKaDg3P+jjrY=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2672/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport error codes would be smaller and more consistent as a varint (#2672)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd42e2475370_37a03f9c62ecd9641430fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 13:42:00 -0000

For HTTP_MALFORMED_FRAME, I think @LPardue PR #2662 that removes it and replaces it with a small number of specific error codes is like a good way to go instead of the 2^60 hack.

@kazuho Are you happy with that PR?  I'm going to write a varint PR with the assumption #2662 or something like it is likely to land, so it will be transport-only.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: