Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)
Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 03:13 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63143130EE2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:13:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2k1HMLeCYOr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:13:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9897130EF7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:13:30 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541646810; bh=OLtmRkO3fQVME2IPvvvTrKWpL6TumbgP9/+kmCCtSxg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=cycKHgM3ngOkWdzvGMAoXq8HYF6CYXGBt4JqRla6lFQJF5BhR07+gs1jJTj5I0AaK kL05dcdmkWheuqUHWcaXcRWKVze9QSr9d29btAFMIgpqntKiu9zJzWhcPomZ7aEOu6 f+eEEwlZZ+vHRboaHYzaXXbAOc3MtCRiPZglHpvE=
From: Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe8df3c4bce9f02d213ae068a2a768bbe71a7c5ca92cf0000000117fb6bda92a169ce168acaf3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978/436858787@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be3a9da615b_62e23fb4274d45c09472d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: siyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/wmo3ia13JK_zGN7csWwLiR9dl5M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:13:40 -0000
I think this is great, but would definitely add a requirement that this behavior should be a SHOULD instead of MUST. The receiver able to say no to a too small value, for instance. Sending more frequent acks in UDP could generate a lot of small packets which have a CPU impact. To prevent DoS the receiver should be able to reject insane values. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978#issuecomment-436858787
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed AC… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Nicolas Kuhn
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… IngJohEricsson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… IngJohEricsson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delaye… craigt