Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)

Kazuho Oku <> Mon, 04 February 2019 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3D7130E0A for <>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:23:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4bx70Odhi0d for <>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3271294FA for <>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:23:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 22:23:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1549261412; bh=ns1udGBQkG88eHQARFyvMS85rvMT7JyVUA937CpgGOU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=I2TDT3Jla/mpKEXM82G/pU6MZUQRQYoxhlNG1WHWV+3QT2rU7FzQm/X8ib6uZHIHT meV4LDeMXt001zN4etkI2TtqRARnr8+mWVZSme0st1+qAWJYD9B/1xuCSspE6ShR6E 7EaAtA+ImIzlgV8+JD/wxwYT8XfAXBWH7Yy3PwCI=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c57da64bacbc_338b3feed5ed45b41375fd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 06:23:36 -0000

@ianswett I like how you frame the issue.

I think that the QUIC bit should either be defined in the invariants draft, or should be greased to avoid it getting ossified. And my weak preference goes to greasing the bit, so that we could have maximum flexibility in the future versions of QUIC.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: