Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference 8.2 of RFC7540 to explain Server Push (#2665)

ianswett <> Tue, 07 May 2019 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4061202EB for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.919
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7VJquuZdEVJ for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162D11202D3 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 13:39:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557261565; bh=4vxfNhjM0vudHeauZK6kA0zPdEF2YxNPKSJ5ImFg/Iw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=llFeqaKmE7KX5b8H2ffo3aWiX/kFKoIFsJisUPHqDtMA5UJnj8zqD7HERUUUQ8lDI rOmHhYlLMNKM0XooS0m98QhV2dAVCM7RhEQhnoJLJHZfs/gj5bOWUumb2lyOIwgaVt boRCjsWP1p1fpZ3g1g4DBzG/kSvT8jNPcNTwmN3c=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2665/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference 8.2 of RFC7540 to explain Server Push (#2665)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd1ecfda607b_47e43fe50cacd95c353538"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 20:39:32 -0000

Maybe this would be better if section 4 was moved after section 6?  Then the concepts would be explained before going into the framing.

I'd also like to reorder/renumber all the push frame types so they're all adjacent to one another and in a sensible order.  Is there a reason they're numbered as they are?  If not, I'll open an issue to renumber them.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: