Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 08:30 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B551200C7
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CmNpGzOZHiBK for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8AD120047
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:30:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1571733018;
bh=CwRe2qycSgHk4Yqb715kBCJeVyzIh35Hhi9YLvDnxak=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=opNW/0bVP9UILlj6zIAhLf1NQlroc7HievhqywVFJR7OZkSfAFi3yNEc7aIjRKBUE
Lba1P8fJURSXA5Xw0OzysYsTcLBwoj8eLROvU2Z5NzvvTnn81B4wwhizCLwdxR2ake
UFlyn/MRqELABE9DA5WeiV9E1ycQrbhaD8gy09LI=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK2B5A44P3V5YE2UJD53XP7KVEVBNHHB4ODZTE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092/review/305034767@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once
(#3092)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5daebe1a4c52a_33e93ff4caccd96434305b";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/x4FBfV3tRNug5k0btvSiNDrySlc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:30:21 -0000
martinthomson commented on this pull request. > @@ -3007,9 +3007,6 @@ guidance offered below seeks to strike this balance. ### Sending ACK Frames {#sending-acknowledgements} -An ACK frame SHOULD be generated for at least every second ack-eliciting packet. -This recommendation is in keeping with standard practice for TCP {{?RFC5681}}. - An endpoint MUST NOT excessively delay acknowledgements of ack-eliciting If you send an ACK for every other received packet and drop all older acknowledgments, then you use at most 19 bytes for an ACK, probably less. I don't think that will break any limits. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092#discussion_r337385994
- [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ