Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport error codes would be smaller and more consistent as a varint (#2672)

Jana Iyengar <> Tue, 07 May 2019 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D52B120071 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HpALCk5J7Sr4 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 16:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77E20120045 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 16:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 16:09:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557270577; bh=7Q+Xa8hvcNS8pFNuify6+02LsaEzzWKqMvM752cGDpY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yN373l2GMQ+S0RcsKfqosgWpGSFGpinAiA0ggvG8vVeR6aqBXTZuTaHOOcU56OnOZ mafyIlnB4oOdGyqKy4p/YYNpXL0rSsDCDQ7gscvT1E02DLhRdzpJ8a4LBtxUy3OEI5 gMxG83pNfznu3Z8ODWtNZEXdD6UUB6+LtHaX2xTw=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2672/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport error codes would be smaller and more consistent as a varint (#2672)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd2103145925_309b3f97e42cd95c2045ba"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 23:09:40 -0000

I think preferences may have changed, and @nibanks did have a preference for varints here anyways. Since nobody had a strong preference either way in #1940, it's probably worth having people voice their opinions if they now believe more strongly than they did before.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: