Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS MUST NOT deliver server 1RTT Rx keys until getting Finished (#3173)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 31 October 2019 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C62120806 for <>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLBNuV9EBwlU for <>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B226E120074 for <>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:44:35 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572558275; bh=xyblqEGZpiM60FtxImKkDFpPcF9MHv5XT2GnHKU2WZg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=m+5FvveaAuAkw3L2vYanCrkr0tHH3ZrI0ldJjGtJkrec4rBJoAVTsgGv3J+W+4a/2 nNa55JyfSPKh1OSGLXooQ4ssnNOTu/e4MbATHtrpl9ICjsS2JsoqZvBf16YwtjArzp I+8h71J7za/azXYhxahjgG9ym83XwothqrpuzcoI=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3173/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS MUST NOT deliver server 1RTT Rx keys until getting Finished (#3173)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dbb55c37793f_18dd3f951f2cd960235296"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:44:38 -0000

@martinduke As said, it is not only QUIC. DTLS 1.3 also uses the TLS 1.3 handshake protocol while having a different packetization layer ("records" in TLS term).

That said, I am fine with letting the editors of the QUIC-TLS draft decide.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: