Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)

Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638B41299FA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 03:27:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.655
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dezGjZ2vfwO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 03:27:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext6.iad.github.net [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ADF4129BB4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 03:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 03:27:19 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1484047639; bh=Ik+23QrI2Pwg15TCGrVbzPF037qQW1BaEiCLs2Meq0M=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=N5oYhswy8qriizoCryiNlKTFi12/6DQlN8F88mPS22uj8tZIqEpzhUS09FowJi2d1 +ECirEfbdvJ/80wEilgC4DSjSxDUcSDITuqOOupvgs+ubmRTblWeXTerbQIwlthtnv a63XDGU5xaqysHMoga3AIB5fShQjhBirJZrTQ7tQ=
From: Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134/271552046@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5874c5178b7b9_fc83fdb2fc231308313c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ghedo
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xUtx9DiaWDpG6x_KBMnRUWce220>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:27:22 -0000

FTR I raised the issue on the TLS list [here](https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg22065.html), however the main response was "compression is scary", but it could just be due to lack of details on my part.

Unfortunately I haven't been able to find the time to do any experimenting (or indeed reply to the mail thread), and haven't heard from Victor.

As for caching, it seems to me RFC7924 is quite a bit less flexible than what we have in Google QUIC (namely, you can only cache full chains, not single entries AFAICT, so e.g. you can't just cache intermediates), but again haven't been able to do any experimenting.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134#issuecomment-271552046