Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC text from DPLPMTUD (#3693)

Gorry Fairhurst <> Tue, 26 May 2020 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E213A0C60 for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 00:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qs5qHvrY61PG for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 00:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A043A0C34 for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 00:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E44960C13 for <>; Tue, 26 May 2020 00:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1590477608; bh=nBjVHgvmUAlNE165X9NF9TwP15F7wHFWjqKjb8smD94=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=btukTa86Y1XD7ahywDYrtVZYTfu7eDIMIJOtYyYS6D/RXS/tpBESuI+xIjvuEboZ5 n8ROsN6QeA+mJLBaFC/mGvapuSmiatXZHtpOP/JtyJ8QBswYpdEOGxRbnl1aYV8GO1 zhgflr63uhLRp+Nr+T5iFSCrkui1cz2L4MWSeZAw=
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 00:20:08 -0700
From: Gorry Fairhurst <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3693/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC text from DPLPMTUD (#3693)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eccc3287931_66c3fededecd964513388"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 07:21:15 -0000

@gorryfair commented on this pull request.

> +These frames might not be retransmitted if a probe packet containing
+them is lost.  The frames consume congestion window,
+which could delay the transmission of subsequent application data.

The initial sentence was already there - I thought it added nothing, so happy to see that removed. 
The fix to the second sentence is broken, but I think this might be /could delay subsequent transmission by the application/?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: