Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 1 or 2? (#2556)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377E91202F0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjjR4vi_rqLh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3FA120303 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=wmtL2pBSisw/WJ5OlKSadamErao=; b=mg49KYAD3Io66p1X ZhEJSya0VQcLxqi9l93iMAXNOjNOSNZdKLmbEsGneBTj64S3mI/DwrG4VUIFxjHW AiRTHqXKJmbI1MAuDCNejQRQWO7czjHGEUp/6S5w/NX4IN8s4gfm05GmiyXoefUd 5en0wqiX/RtZX3mIuJ7rts0kcQA=
Received: by filter0624p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0624p1iad2-2025-5C9A3556-11 2019-03-26 14:21:10.807177901 +0000 UTC m=+937545.249988501
Received: from github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.41]) by ismtpd0014p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Ye6mn1x4RmmtmZGC_Lgyuw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:21:10.665 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBAB3E024A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:21:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2fb89c9f08771cd746c32b803c1d6a63c84fdfdb92cf0000000118b1f75692a169ce195b9436@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556/476667933@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 1 or 2? (#2556)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9a35569c49b_78ce3fa23dcd45b469943"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2ZG4A9HhOlr5HWINlQmrM0HlWsFwhTb9Of7o 3xX+4q8wY5fiOSkjzDfcHVW+BkzCO8/JJHG7IMG2iQOOOIvusexbU1okc8kPVlzRwyYPRXJAQ9g0tO JDaX6bl7ihqE6W7zQKO1TUjYi3iz+MGsSPrFOg0aGwVEj7ZLI3BQcYapjUsAFltxQp/YXcW4mFQ2X2 Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xaQ0oTpru7GjOpjjZ7j5rOrzjBQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:21:46 -0000

The recovery draft currently says MUST send 1, and MAY send up to 2 (https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.html#rfc.section.6.3.2). Is that not good enough?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556#issuecomment-476667933