IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] OnPacketsLost for Nonretransmittable Packets (#2015)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Fri, 16 November 2018 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652FF128D09 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:16:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6C8oKsbit04b for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599FF12007C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:16:24 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542402984; bh=FrB3lLPxJ14Wh0s6ywJc75yTc+DIay32PyLvROwMeVA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=rNpijg4TjPySye5AFhz2Gl7hSm9gHDZtS4xVud7iwvsjCLR9QqbCA2LQeOhsQd19y DejpYxJ9y/UpIdcOsw834ny6CtDL+RGvkY3eNF7EH7f6ObPKS4va1QBy+XlycRWLep TqOPJ4O/2Zo//oC+QPLCqxU2gFPomlOagjhIR/1Y=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab28199c9977236929f32bba09a4aa76ac60e86d4692cf000000011806f5a892a169ce16c13e3b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2015@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] OnPacketsLost for Nonretransmittable Packets (#2015)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bef33a83f02d_61143fcd530d45c0108599"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xdlRf18_ivvU6FpeZwRQuFvzeb0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:16:28 -0000

Why isn't `OnPacketsLost` called for nonretransmittable packets? Just because you don't retransmit the information contained in the packet, doesn't mean it's loss wasn't an indication of a congestion event, right? If you send an ACK only packet, then three data packets after it, and you then get an ACK for just the data packets, shouldn't you consider there have been a congestion event?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2015

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status