[quicwg/base-drafts] 9da977: Editorial improvement

Martin Thomson <noreply@github.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC3D3A0AE2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWO4AbCsVU-7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3366E3A0ADB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.92]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397808C0CD4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588901979; bh=LIDVolSxhFdWmKdMbvGjzgf91jyAiGut47eQ199JFu8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=bm22lecvAtVxisgZZZPmR+Ef/3JTp9xwyIA3uvqpRqL59zrimhIybZwfeqbfPjP/I FOpK+OwUAv/+E+I8jqIGJxNcwhRFLmlo0RXG1P37pIsTRY64yUuZDdxgVfs0F0MooF C4fPI780HhSOTZ0VGDSnScHEmefJ15wqRsWwhfag=
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 18:39:39 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <noreply@github.com>
To: quic-issues@ietf.org
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/push/refs/heads/forgery-limit/d5613b-cdf655@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] 9da977: Editorial improvement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xqKuDeQJ9UMUSpc1UMvwx6JOPoc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 01:39:42 -0000

  Branch: refs/heads/forgery-limit
  Home:   https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
  Commit: 9da9774ddd3638a4f85faf29893495b5855fcbe9
      https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/9da9774ddd3638a4f85faf29893495b5855fcbe9
  Author: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
  Date:   2020-05-08 (Fri, 08 May 2020)

  Changed paths:
    M draft-ietf-quic-tls.md

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Editorial improvement


  Commit: cdf655307293ebf7be598849ccdad0f41ce32e11
      https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/cdf655307293ebf7be598849ccdad0f41ce32e11
  Author: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
  Date:   2020-05-08 (Fri, 08 May 2020)

  Changed paths:
    M draft-ietf-quic-tls.md

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Math is hard, halve the numbers again

Based on input from @chris-wood, it appears as though the length
calculation was off.

Of course, the length calculation is off anyway, because 2^10 is
arbitrary and doesn't match the expected packet size. But as long as
we're being arbitrary, we can at least be *consistently* arbitrary.


Compare: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/compare/d5613bc37a4a...cdf655307293