Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestion Window specification is incorrect (#3997)
Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 09:13 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73453A1422 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXYU3G5a8Gp9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663E83A1414 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.18.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A874B5E0EC6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597655605; bh=HNTrp3kxnsWkS/l/eKTi5RlVW2+0a+6CVs3DeB1Mkxs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qFNADflRqfZmJb81uJyuGZfJij5/U7hwjlUB6cGvaPxgLePC7PmfyNaLZAVgxVjvc QPklnEXjlJqG8Cfox/qGk8CPw7d+FRRIEh+z/RTDjxZIdrrjlnL3dMKOaMcYRw5PTo PrqR8O9XzNUW+MqIs5h/ynjtacKsNinkCOs78V4w=
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:13:25 -0700
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4MR6HT4ODUQLSHDFF5IYVTLEVBNHHCQ5AU7A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3997/674762059@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3997@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3997@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestion Window specification is incorrect (#3997)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3a4a3599e31_dab196468261c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xqpS7Pt-FGiPuVoTL-t547zVGiY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:13:28 -0000
I agree with Mirja on what TCP should do, and that such paths are recommended to reset IW to RW. That seems safe. My point was slightly different, we could consider for QUIC that the reduction might allow IW (cwnd) to be recomputed based on the actual PMTU. The PR seems to be heading this direction. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3997#issuecomment-674762059
- [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestion Wi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC's Initial Congestio… Jana Iyengar