Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow the Transport to Stop/Reset a Stream? (#3291)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Sun, 08 December 2019 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB241200E9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 14:34:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jJWCPdlZlD-k for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 14:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4A712006E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 14:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 14:34:38 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1575844478; bh=OdMRiTKUtCM7H7+WjdEG9EYdrtfRC7dmFWPc5rc+6fE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Jsde9IqDhBn3JJBjulK0sJ2PQic96MycCFsRcqX3xbWgKWyXTxnJzfGSLO0ypp8x7 Gah/vCaPrWMt42CK9iLWPwr6ezRhDf5nuHiPlDPVDOzXd+Nmt9L3BR9VfwTJmEqn8E I8ycMxNK/yndJWb95meiuJc11YBBZqJQx/SSr8LY=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5SZTOHSX35ULKACZF37KWP5EVBNHHB7WKXVY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3291/563003630@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3291@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3291@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow the Transport to Stop/Reset a Stream? (#3291)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ded7a7e6f0a0_20763f8fc56cd95c18965d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xsqL2pR7QN8bka-YIY2C1DWvubU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 22:34:41 -0000

If you are concerned about - for example - catching an application exception and having something to use to signal stream closure in that case, let the application decide and configure a default application error code.  The HTTP/3 internal error (H3_INTERNAL_ERROR) seems like a fine choice for that default.  Configure it along with ALPN if you need a catch-all.

This seems entirely solvable at the interface to the transport.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3291#issuecomment-563003630