IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC version number scheme (#51)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 May 2017 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BCC126557 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-U3PnH0EDHY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F71120046 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=k+tBDA8vN5WKow7HAHoNW8uUkKw=; b=rZ6lSFFMkIaJcvYc shGZSncJqiaDanW8JwJyCPXk7a1whkF5WgnGKBYshS/PHsSUIZBTB4SJQbGW8V0u lAcfqIvVOLrQYi/3wsO410/UZuBq+zbXC0K/1d242fux0d9ApANE4P11aAuK2TlR iqp/+9lYOpS6ZOzKXtDR8bfu62Q=
Received: by filter1083p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1083p1mdw1-18504-590BD921-6B 2017-05-05 01:45:05.925275366 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 8QNDSM0tSY20NWqgrqBbWw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 May 2017 01:45:05.983 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 18:45:05 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab80764346e48a9f7998c8dfe72bb8bf2097a51da492cf0000000115239b2192a169ce0b78ad23@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/51/299352603@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/51@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/51@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC version number scheme (#51)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_590bd921dbec6_7c553f986fb71c30151029"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1a3g7PiinXbWLiYvdotVAyF4VymyYEfG7mm0 E1QAug4Ho+PIUyjPv8nurYQSmYyAMBHpjRgBXYoRoZt1Gxu1VRvDvFwRQo39CMdSO+8ROf0+QVAKUu q4rylIJyXG4PMwNEk4TTqLNk4xYEG3CN5QavYCUjsPyzjNKWCybl1oguYw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xxd9AFJ7TdTQmwAoklV9IMnh2Ss>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 01:45:08 -0000

I think that experimental versions that have been widely deployed probably make sense to be in the draft. Again, what's your objection?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/51#issuecomment-299352603

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status