[quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during handshake (#594)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 12:42 UTC

Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:42:19 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab03edc0991cfcdc99f6ab51428d00c273a77b7ae092cf00000001154e652b92a169ce0df0b5b8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/594@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during handshake (#594)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5936a32b3daf9_5b2b3ff17fce3c3016263"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/yBlhT3n5UTuftBAPffNMmDtzKVs>

We need to state this as an assumption.  This is particularly relevant in the case where we have version negotiation and a rebalancing of the connection-id-based routing on the server cluster.  We're opting for a hope-based solution here and assuming that the server will be the same (or at least run the same versions) and that the 5-tuple is enough to keep the routing the same.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/594

[quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during han… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… Igor Lubashev
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple is stable during… Martin Thomson