Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method (#3681)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Sat, 30 May 2020 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797093A12E1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMFsyI417jhG for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-13.smtp.github.com (out-13.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284E23A12E0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-a27607f.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-a27607f.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.18.61]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D81260471 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1590802175; bh=qXjMcZWGBFOztt056K2/TaxhlNwHPJT0nWIKMH2I4v8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rkj/D8AtKIwnioNnvaFn7go6eLqFAfRQT3mDUr0cIAyH4MnDrtBulP7gNmA4DqWeA //VO266PLilRlKvDSvyQNUNXfoBaTQKseTldVYWZxujjXSl9wwNbd0hGGW512ap5tg 8WgHOI9rLct95z29weK15EQc7TMTO9jtf+tU3MXU=
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:29:35 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5BG45K4KQ4RELQVDF43WL77EVBNHHCKEI7XY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681/review/421361725@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method (#3681)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ed1b6ff4e30a_74a03fd98c4cd95c247040"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/yK0vgR7AKAEz_SIXVJxWcAEfsfU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 01:29:38 -0000
@janaiyengar commented on this pull request. This is much cleaner -- thanks for working on it! A few comments. > + # Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets + if (no in-flight packets): + if (has handshake keys): + return (now() + duration), Handshake + else: + return (now() + duration), Initial + pto_timeout = infinite + pto_space = Initial + for space in [ Initial, Handshake, ApplicationData ]: + if (no in-flight packets in space): + continue; + if space == ApplicationData: + // Skip ApplicationData until handshake complete. + if (handshake is not complete): + return pto_timeout, pto_space + // ApplicationData include the max_ack_delay in PTO. ```suggestion // Include max_ack_delay and backoff for ApplicationData. ``` > space = pn_space return time, space +GetPtoTimeAndSpace(): + duration = (smoothed_rtt + max(4 * rttvar, kGranularity)) + * (2 ^ pto_count) + # Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets ```suggestion // Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets. ``` > space = pn_space return time, space +GetPtoTimeAndSpace(): + duration = (smoothed_rtt + max(4 * rttvar, kGranularity)) + * (2 ^ pto_count) + # Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets + if (no in-flight packets): Assuming this is for the amplification protection, something's missing here. Perhaps this should be `if (is_client && no packets in flight && !PeerCompletedAddressValidation())`. Otherwise, you never get into the case below on line 1293. > space = pn_space return time, space +GetPtoTimeAndSpace(): + duration = (smoothed_rtt + max(4 * rttvar, kGranularity)) + * (2 ^ pto_count) + # Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets + if (no in-flight packets): + if (has handshake keys): + return (now() + duration), Handshake + else: + return (now() + duration), Initial + pto_timeout = infinite + pto_space = Initial + for space in [ Initial, Handshake, ApplicationData ]: + if (no in-flight packets in space): + continue; + if space == ApplicationData: ```suggestion if (space == ApplicationData): ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681#pullrequestreview-421361725
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation into a… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation in… Jana Iyengar