Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 17 January 2019 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8411B130F4D for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:30:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.552
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEI4eEvMvwNZ for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1311E12785F for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:30:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1547695848; bh=idNhXcQJoPkakB382qznYMQQmvdgEXGGr1J1kEZ2dUs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zptRIkdx+6u1AJF4uLKRSzCAUoYLrM73VN9UbeXkXhqZeZrR+gr6ylbfWjhnmkbkn dsVQWudxRc3A2Jhj/SFgKiuM0LpqyjASpePqfncpTPqQM4gUt1gQVEW6WpKtXzxcJZ k4qENwQj+XxOdHXpYbmEB+mPmeu0CNf1ZtriL9RQ=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2135/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3ff6e8c5b35_53423fa381cd45c4489745"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:30:51 -0000

> I don't see anyone objecting to that approach, is there some text you'd like added to one of the drafts?

Filed #2341. I do not have a strong opinion on whether this needs to be clarified, therefore I would not oppose if the PR gets refused.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: