Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)

Kazuho Oku <> Tue, 14 May 2019 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0022712012B for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-8Vao2r8jPV for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3CF1200B8 for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 18:58:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557799099; bh=2ceMBxov9qpK7vT6LFixYCwViI8EuxEMfw79uvOD9pU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nj/Pn9qEyRIKVpULxdkJuoerd63K5XumimzK4eEYk3+GuGDgCw+LoayQnEzhGnnCk 1H/GYSN2aM1iliTP4F/IgrQvHOpyc/t1J6oeRlwmN+jm16fMY40WrdAQttPloxXuJ2 vWVHrSaYG0x4hXbb4jjNr+C5Y78odo0rIr33OFOQ=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2691/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cda20bbd9b25_17e13fdb772cd96c2308b9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 01:58:23 -0000

I think I'm fine with what the PR says now.

Though I'm also fine to see something like "the receiver SHOULD treat duplicates of TP that the endpoint supports as a connection error" being added.

The issue with "MAY validate" in general is that it is sometimes hard for smaller players to enforce, because they'd be risking interoperability unless other players also enforce the behavior to the extent that the endpoints violating the requirement would never be shipped.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: