Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not ACK-eliciting (#2372)

ianswett <> Mon, 28 January 2019 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32837130F2C for <>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:52:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPXkfDQuJya9 for <>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6D0130F0B for <>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548640338; bh=h4e+MPtSI20qaoVUwH7lfnHl4TX07ZToTAGeYu0sRuo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i8tbHSSeMG0CDpU6uWdXUTf/O5Z1uwv16s+gYcGbsp26V58Z3SsBzeF0HLCnmT7gf 2rm0DHq0FCnX+86B/OnGYiUA0Ai8E1XRGD4bM/r/Lk4TjWVw+afSK1LUiER0em57tf X9CB9D4uoWUVbxgqR+DyrGoOHPGyy8c5Td48DVXA=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2372/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames are not ACK-eliciting (#2372)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4e605261e25_d033fa6a1cd45c4138519"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 01:52:21 -0000

I think you're supposed to send the ACK on the non-probing path, but I'm not the connection migration expert.

The main benefit of them not being ack-eliciting in my mind is it makes it clear that their loss should not cause a congestion control reaction.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: