Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4055)
mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 07 September 2020 08:19 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4F93A08B2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 01:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4HYFztxrDnha for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 01:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34ABF3A0141 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 01:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-28f8021.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-28f8021.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.98]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CEA7A00AA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 01:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1599466784; bh=9ZdHeIsbjU1wCsmWt6lNdpjFJ76Esa1PgriMCDCtw/I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=l2x17+R++pt64p/E+iZ2kWxc3sRc0hRyHz5s5HKxlZFKQmhQX7jFNdALggZsY9At4 sN1B6ZhdpBcTrxIuasrLubyd00puxCcOGaiXQrzSUDrgD2LR5j2BCM1x1UvhZjB4wu 49OoarYTRnqejbgICEDqBVgeuM2Zvgkfe4U4MT8Q=
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:19:44 -0700
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6RNSEZGHYLSHML7NN5MHHCBEVBNHHCRYSBB4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4055/review/483348765@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4055@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4055@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4055)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f55ed2091f67_734719f03355c1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/yaO0RG0kb1w79B8vpRtZl89zypI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 08:19:51 -0000
@mirjak commented on this pull request. > The recovery period aims to limit congestion window reduction to once per round -trip. Therefore during recovery, the congestion window remains unchanged -irrespective of new losses or increases in the ECN-CE counter. +trip. Therefore during a recovery period, the congestion window does not change +in response to new losses or increases in the ECN-CE count. + +A recovery period ends and the sender enters congestion avoidance when a packet +sent during the recovery period is acknowledged. This is slightly different +from TCP's definition of recovery, which ends when the lost segment that +started recovery is acknowledged ({{?RFC5681}}). + +### Congestion Avoidance + +A NewReno sender is in congestion avoidance any time the congestion window is How is this specific to NewReno? It's the definition of the ssthresh that you are in slow start when your cwnd is below that value. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4055#discussion_r484268552
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Mike Bishop
- [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4055) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] State machine for CC (#4… Jana Iyengar