Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)

Marcus Ihlar <> Tue, 09 April 2019 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B471202EC for <>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 06:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jo5ALEiGdzNA for <>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 06:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D301201B9 for <>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 06:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:43:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1554817432; bh=PrzQuk1vO/0yYPewZA0wOqL83WNeEcTB8OtjjuroNvw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ASH/jytRc4lYX3OcyTjkyNq+fScgGbio9IUaPRw+Nh0Z4zsTTJv+OMoRHnESdEYYI zeGxAi7IVh4Kx8SG/7uOZPGUcu0FLZE/cOBvc3Cp/qiWpoVao58lqYZWvT2VWO5j// 87Nb92Mc/baBsGv/Pu0f82SnzGt80hSMD2T9m4FE=
From: Marcus Ihlar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2564/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5caca198c6285_5dce3fa8b4cd45b484478"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ihlar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 13:43:55 -0000

ihlar commented on this pull request.

> +the spin bit on a randomly chosen fraction of connections. The random selection
+process SHOULD be designed such that on average the spin bit is disabled for at
+least one eighth of network paths. The selection process should be externally
+unpredictable but consistent for any given combination of source and destination
+address and port. The selection process performed at the beginning of the
+connection SHOULD be applied for all paths used by the connection.
+In case multiple connections share the same five-tuple, i.e. same source and
+destination IP address and UDP port the setting of the spin bit needs to be
+coordinated across all connections to ensure a clear signal to any on path
+measurement point, however that might not be feasible.
+When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints MAY set the spin bit to any value, and
+MUST accept any incoming value. It is RECOMMENDED that they set the spin bit to
+a random value either chosen independently for each packet, or chosen
+independently for each path and kept constant for that path.

I do agree with Mirja that it would be nice to recommend per-connection random, but I don't have a strong opinion as I'll have to expect per packet random regardless.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: