Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)

janaiyengar <> Thu, 22 November 2018 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A450128CF3 for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:15:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEt__kXP6UNW for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C41912D4F2 for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:14:58 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1542845698; bh=DnFd2cmMGBHHFLWDaYfnAYerMJIS9L8SU2TizewPDJI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SW5ZoHkC0+XW9bL8gzjyjegN6Zn2z7Tc+MxKJB9FOPw49FrSto/ua7nrvhFxliCN1 OVrrGG/yCMFOk/cDJqz//OXgvquncjCzzBXcDl+nom/BQM3XReh/0RhJhowTHEI3sr 5ntGLisHQPrp8dnTUnVtAAuelDj61Xoe6pCqfvqs=
From: janaiyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2028/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore loss of undecryptable packets (#2028)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf5f502d2d5d_5f333fcf5bcd45b42236e9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:15:01 -0000

I think this could be made a bit more specific:
- loss of Handshake packets and 0-RTT packets SHOULD NOT trigger a CC response.
- loss of 1-RTT packets triggers CC as normal, with one exception. A congestion controller MAY choose to ignore loss signals from packets that might have been discarded due to packet protection keys being unavailable.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: