IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5891241F5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 01:06:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvQdE0e72pmF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 01:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1080F124D6C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 01:06:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Faekq7lcw9m/0Qb2uSe0YH2C3Qg=; b=DZkQFoxRQarnInSc QnNLLu69bZ9CEtjG11sKSP86gO8SaGmbArV61zt/B6VPQo0mBcv8Wcjr4eYcdwDB 7sJbyr4KdCcBJLsTkgJqA4/d76BMBNhnvAp68zJbRqRC6befeP1QqKuSOanzmkhr cvtCtV/Y34F6EbkvIjxwTC7tYQE=
Received: by filter1189p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1189p1mdw1-12563-5A781E9E-A 2018-02-05 09:06:38.250454414 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0048p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Xj3yyuc7SzOyAugzy6xslg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:06:38.233 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:06:38 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab50350eb5caf09f575b1987f3e12215003f2ca81992cf00000001168fe09d92a169ce0c118d76@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203/363022065@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a781e9df02bb_4d873fb339f76f302470bd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2vdh7WgBNmN0c/z/X7YwzRlQC0NK2/4PjFa6 ApgG/GbizpErgHIwObry5+4onRgHjq10WTkYeEegxPVOMKN6T3MiXj2l5C1vxR9kE39mQUyETlpWJt IbqrMipEPs6sW4kyPZPXTMPtC8joBZF4XbFPgVQdsUqS0ZpFT+m6YMDFkA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/yvBiBNFJuTTpwRlB2ZdDGvvfzA4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:06:41 -0000

I imagine CID can be used to reject or prioritise packets before full AEAD in some scenarios. For this to work, it is probably helpful to have visible headers. Scrambling could be done by extending packet number encryption to cover the entire header.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203#issuecomment-363022065

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status