Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minor TLS draft editorial corrections (#2446)

Martin Thomson <> Wed, 20 March 2019 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2DD131260 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-_Jj0PnV5T4 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D2C131253 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:51:35 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1553118695; bh=qF/RtcWNtXRtL9i+5AwoYC3bZiQtxeEFGnP0YnGUaYI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1PXlnU8MM3Nyv7JR+1iQjcVoXRD2pLiZAn/b6jSh2ehMejwnObOFRf469p30siLdW dONX8SNr9dXd8g5EE0K/OoeWMzBAUSAodUSaEHWIlhwba14bfV8rRsrg038PiWfrbT 2lnEtRQrCM1+RqttknX5+Yptldsa6phNlfBnsGgw=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2446/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minor TLS draft editorial corrections (#2446)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c92b5e7c53a3_65353f85182d45c44544dd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:51:39 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.

> @@ -269,7 +271,7 @@ At a high level, there are two main interactions between the TLS and QUIC
 * The TLS component sends and receives messages via the QUIC component, with
-  QUIC providing a reliable stream abstraction to TLS.
+  QUIC providing a reliable stream and record abstraction to TLS.

I think that this would be a mistake.  TLS only requires a stream abstraction.  QUIC has its own need for a record-like abstraction (we call them packets), but that is not relevant here.

If you revert this, I can merge it.

(@martinduke, be careful who you are tagging...)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: